Multipart vs base64

Content conversion is the process of correctly formatting a message for each recipient. The decision to perform content conversion on a message depends on the destination and format of the message. They types of content conversion that occur in Exchange and Exchange are unchanged from Exchange Message conversion for external recipients : This type of content conversion includes the Transport Neutral Encapsulation Format TNEF conversion options and message encoding options for external recipients.

Messages sent to recipients inside the Exchange organization don't require this type of content conversion. This type of content conversion is handled by the categorizer in the Transport service on a Mailbox server.

Search engine optimisation

Categorization on each message happens after a newly arrived message is put in the Submission queue. In addition to recipient resolution and routing resolution, content conversion is performed on the message before the message is put in a delivery queue.

If a single message contains multiple recipients, the categorizer determines the appropriate encoding for each message recipient. Content conversion tracing doesn't capture any content conversion failures that the categorizer encounters as it converts messages sent to external recipients. MAPI conversion for internal recipients : his type of content conversion is handled by the Mailbox Transport service.

The Mailbox Transport service exists on Mailbox servers to transmit messages between mailbox databases on the local server, and the Transport service on Mailbox servers.

Specifically, the Mailbox Transport Submission service transmits messages from the sender's Outbox to the Transport service on a Mailbox server. The Mailbox Transport Delivery service transmits messages from the Transport service on a Mailbox server to the recipient's Inbox. Content conversion tracing captures these MAPI conversion failures. For more information, see Managing Content Conversion Tracing. The message can't contain different fonts or other text formatting. The following two formats can be used for a plain text message:.

Attachments must be encoded by using Uuencode. Uuencode represents Unix-to-Unix encoding and defines an encoding algorithm to store binary attachments in the body of an email message by using US-ASCII text characters.

Any message attachments are encoded by using Quoted-printable or Base64 encoding.

User agent chrome ios

The rich text message format is completely different from the rich text document format that's available in Word. A TNEF message contains a plain text version of the message and an attachment that packages the original formatted version of the message. Typically, this attachment is named Winmail. The Winmail. The plain text version of the message is displayed, and the message contains an attachment named Winmail.

The plain text version of the message is displayed. The TNEF attachment is ignored or removed. The result is a plain text message. Therefore, there's no plain text representation of the message, and there's no distinct Winmail.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. Base64 Base64 is a way to encode binary data into an ASCII character format by translating it into a radix representation.

Learn more. What is difference Between Base64 and Multipart? Ask Question. Asked 2 years, 11 months ago. Active 5 months ago. Viewed 14k times. Can any one explain what is the advantage of Base64 as well Multipart I know Multipart is faster then Base But still many developers are using Base I studied both documentation but i am not clear.

You cannot compare base64 with multipart. They have nothing to do with each other. Active Oldest Votes. Maraj Hussain Maraj Hussain 1, 7 7 silver badges 23 23 bronze badges. Mariyappan your welcome, If you find this answered is good enough for you then don't forgot to accept it.

It is worth noting though that in most all? Multipart ist a part of the http protocol. Serialization is used to transmit data from one component to another e. It's done in a form that both components can understand, mostly with the ASCII format, as this is common since long time. Base64 will transform your data into a stream of ASCII characters which can be read by almost any computer component. Deserialization is the opposite of serialization.

multipart vs base64

The sender component serializes the data to transmit and the recipient DEserializes the stream of data. The whole process is called 'Serialization'.

Base64 contains only ASCII, so it's used to switch your data into a form that can be easily serialized and deserialized. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog.Post a Comment. Even though both can be used to send both text and binary data to the server there is a subtle difference between them. In the case of x-www-form-urlencodedthe whole form data is sent as a long query string.

This is achieved by using a suitable encoding e. Btw, I agree that Web Development is a very vast topic and you need to learn a lot of things apart from frameworks and programming languages.

A description of the multipart/mixed Internet message format

It's one of the best resources to fill gaps in your understanding and become a valuable web developer. Share to Twitter Share to Facebook.

That was clear and easy to understand : April 8, at AM javin paul said Thank you Nancy, happy that you find it useful April 9, at AM. Newer Post Older Post Home. Subscribe to: Post Comments Atom. Follow by Email. Interview Questions core java interview question Coding Interview Question 73 data structure and algorithm 73 interview questions 57 SQL Interview Questions 33 object oriented programming 32 design patterns 30 thread interview questions 30 collections interview questions 25 spring interview questions 20 database interview questions 16 servlet interview questions 15 Programming interview question 6 hibernate interview questions 6.

How to design a vending machine in Java? How HashMap works in Java? Why String is Immutable in Java? How to close telnet terminal in Linux and Windows Pages Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions. Copyright by Javin Paul Powered by Blogger. Search This Blog. Download The E-book.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. Software Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professionals, academics, and students working within the systems development life cycle.

It only takes a minute to sign up. I'm working in C and doing some communication between 2 apps I'm writing. Now I am at the point where I am writing a routine to send a record between the two servers that includes some text data and a file.

SO Question "Multipart forms from C client". This format is quite distressing to someone who is used to nice JSON data. So obviously the solution is to create a JSON request and Base64 encode the file and end up with a request like this:.

And we can make use of JSON serialization and deserialization anywhere we would like. On top of that, the code to send this data is quite simple.

You just create your class for JSON serialization and then set the properties. The file string property is set in a few trivial lines:. No more silly delimiters and headers for each item. Now the remaining question is performance. So I profiled that. I have a set of 50 sample files that I would be needing to send across the wire that range from 50KB to 1.

First I wrote some lines to simply stream in the file to a byte array to compare that to the logic that streams in the file and then converts it to a Base64 stream. Below are the 2 chunks of code that I profiled:. The results were that the simple read always took 0ms, but that the Base64 encoding took up to 5ms.

Below are the longest times:. So I modified the form-data code so that it checked for the delimiter bytes in the file itself to make sure everything would be parsed ok. I didn't write an optimized scanning algorithm, so I just made the delimiter small so that it wouldn't waste a lot of time. Now the results are showing me that the form-data method will actually be significantly slower.

It doesn't seem that an optimized algorithm would do much better either seeing as my delimiter was only 5 characters long. Not 3x better anyways, which is the performance advantage of doing a Base64 encoding instead of checking the file bytes for a delimiter.

HOW TO: Convert file to Byte [] and base64 C#

Obviously the Base64 encoding will inflate the size as I show in the first table, but its really not that bad even with Unicode capable UTF-8 and would compress well if desired. But the real benefit is my code is nice and clean and easily understandable and it doesn't hurt my eyeballs to look at the JSON request payload that much either. There are the Standards, but these do change relatively often. Standards are really just suggestions anyways right? You can understand that internet bandwidth was a more valuable commodity than CPU cycles when the protocol was invented.

multipart vs base64

There is no reason to use it for server-to-server communication. Server-to-server communication is usually not form-based. Communication objects are more complex and require nesting and types--the requirements that JSON handles well.

Base64 encoding is a simple solution for transferring binary objects in whatever serialization format you choose. Not sure about CPU performance vs. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service.

Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. I have a server and I need to upload files along with some fields from the client to the server. Problem is, JSON doesn't represent binary data. But it does have much better handling of file-uploads. I am at a loss for how to design this. You might also consider this approach: send all files using multipart, then get some identificators of files as a response.

Put this identificators in your json and send it anyway you like. This approach might be beneficial if you have many scenarios in which you send files: you might always send them to the server with the same request, then get their identificators; after that do with them what you like. Learn more. Ask Question. Asked 7 years, 2 months ago. Active 7 years, 1 month ago. Viewed 12k times. Active Oldest Votes. This should work.

Anton Ryabyh Anton Ryabyh 1, 1 1 gold badge 10 10 silver badges 9 9 bronze badges. The last approach advocating separate calls one for the Multipart image and another for the JSON data is interesting. The only concern being 2 API calls instead of one. Ofcourse, this trade off is app-specific. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password.

Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog.

Tristar t120 accessories

Podcast Ben answers his first question on Stack Overflow. The Overflow Bugs vs. Featured on Meta. Responding to the Lavender Letter and commitments moving forward. Related Hot Network Questions. Question feed. Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled.As does Brandt Snedeker. Not only has Sea Island been unkind to Sneds (best finish is a T-32 in three events), but the veteran is making his first appearance since June, recovering from a bizarre, scary chest injury.

Worse, Snedeker has undergone swing changes to address the ailment. Admitting he's not 100 percent, Snedeker is one of our stay-aways this weekend. In terms of likes, Brian Harman tops our expert's list. Mentioned above, putting prowess will be key, an attribute that certainly applies to Harman. The 30-year-old lead the tour in total putting last season, and ranked fifth in the sg: putting.

Throw in two top 10s this autumn, Harman's a sound bet for a high finish. Same goes for Webb Simpson.

Pterodactyl docker

Open champ has finished T-12 or better in three of five appearances here, and has two top 20s in the early season. Though he ranked 32nd in overall putting last year, his around-the-green output (14th in strokes gained, first in scrambling from the rough, fifth in sand saves) shows he has the game to excel at Sea Island. He's not exactly a sleeper pick, yet Simpson's popularity shouldn't keep you from picking him in your lineup. Check out the projections from the professor and expert, and play with the tool below to make your own picks for the 2017 RSM Classic.

Golf Digest may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. By Joel BeallAmazingly, the fall season is already coming to a close. This paper reports an analysis of the accuracy of predictions of structural disorder received as part of the CASP5 experiment.

Ullu apk mod

Six groups made predictions of disorder. The predictions of the four most active groups have been compared with the experimental results, in terms of the sensitivity and specificity of the methods. All four methods succeed in detecting over half the disordered residues in the targets, with a generally low rate of over-prediction. Two of the methods perform significantly better when the structure of a related protein is available.

Omniprint ink

There is a trade-off between the fraction of disordered residues detected and the extent of over-prediction, and groups have adopted different compromises in this respect. Comparison of performance at the same over-prediction rates highlights the role of related structures in some methods rather than others, with different groups achieving the highest sensitivity for different target sets.Pat and Marc Brian, Canada Norway Grand Tour, July 2013 Our entire experience with Nordic Visitor was very enjoyable.

Thank you for all your assistance. Mindy, United States Iceland Full Circle, June 2013 My husband and I traveled through Nordic Visitor for a full circle Iceland Activity Tour. KarenCanada Iceland Complete, June 2013 This was a trip of a lifetime for us.

Subscribe to RSS

Thanks ever so much Dan, United States Express Iceland, June 2013 We were delighted by our Express Iceland tour, and the arrangements made on our behalf by Nordic Visitor. Karen, South Africa Iceland Complete, May 2013 We found the whole experience of visiting Iceland was very much smoothed by the prior arrangements and efficient service. William, United States Express Iceland, May 2013 The tour was very comprehensive and well organized.

Bartek, Canada Iceland Full Circle, May 2013 Me and my girlfriend drove around the country (12 days because we added some extra nights to the base trip) on a self drive tour booked through Nordic Visitor.

Sarah, United Kingdom Express Iceland, March 2013 From the word go Larus at Nordic Visitor helped us plan our holiday perfectly, and enjoy it to the maximum. And they we Marci, United States The Golden Triangle of Scandinavia, March 2013 I was very impressed with the service and everything went smoothly.

Sarah, United States Express Iceland, February 2013 We had an absolutely amazing experience. James, United Kingdom Iceland Winter World, December 2012 A fantastic trip that had exceeded all my expectations.

Jennifer, United States Winter Romance, November 2012 We have already recommended Nordic Visitor to all our friends and family. Tasha, United States Iceland Full Circle, October 2012 It was a great trip. Alain Bassard, France Express Norway, August 2012 All the hotels were very good and staff were all very friendly.

Stephanie, United States Iceland Full Circle, July 2012 My husband and I have travelled through many parts of the world and we agreed that our trip to Iceland was one of the best. Tom Brunning, United Kingdom Adventures and Activities in Reykjavik, July 2012 It was a great holiday, really enjoed by the whole family. Very well organised on the whole. All the guides were extremely friendly and helpful making all the the tours interesting.

I think the highlight was the day in the super jeep tour. Ahmet, Turkey Expedition Voyage around Spitsbergen, June 2012 Hi Cecilia Very professional.

multipart vs base64

BetsyGite, United States Iceland Full Circle, May 2012 Nordic Visitor planned our full circle tour of Iceland in early May. Barbara and Jim, United States Exotic Hideaways, May 2012 Maria - We can't tell you enough what a spectacular vacation we had in Iceland. Audra, United States Express Iceland, May 2012 Everything was extremely well done, I though. Peter, Australia Scenic Fjords of Norway, May 2012 Nordic Visitor impressed us from the start with instant replies to Emails and the ability to call Nordic Visitor using a 1800 number from Australia, as I did once, was great.

Richard, United States Winter Activity Week in Iceland, March 2012 Your staff was very helpful setting up the trip with our special requests and making sure things were right while we were on the trip. Jan, United Kingdom Northern Comfort in a Holiday Cottage, February 2012 We have traveled independently many times but with a short stay of one week decided that going through a travel company would help us make best use of our time- and the ability to do a 'facilitated' self guided tour was perfect for us.

Alice, United Kingdom Northern Comfort in a Holiday Cottage, January 2012 Kevin, Canada Iceland Full Circle, September 2011 The information package was so good that a meeting with my travel agent was not required. Megan, United States Romance Around Iceland, August 2011 We had a wonderful experience.

Content conversion

Paul, United Kingdom Iceland Full Circle, July 2011 Our overall experience was very good and we would definitely be happy to recommend Nordic Visitor to friends and family. Katrin, United States Iceland Grand Tour, June 2011 I usually book all our vacations myself and was a little nervous about handing the vacation over to a stranger, but Nordic Visitor has changed my mind. James and Misty, United States Golden Circle and South Coast - Winter, April 2011 Why chose this tour because we had a limited time in Iceland and wanted to see as much as we could in the time allotted.

Diane, United States Romance Around Iceland, October 2010 Dear Maria: It's been a while since my son and his bride have retuned from their Icelandic dream honeymoon. All the best to you and happy holidays. Filipe Tempero, Portugal Scenic Ring of Iceland, June 2010 Just want to thank you and Nordic Visitor team for the excellent service you providenever experienced in a travel agency such a professional and kind treatment.

Linda, United States Sweden in a Nutshell, July 2009 Thank you so very much for organizing our recent trip to Sweden.

thoughts on “Multipart vs base64”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *